The latest edition of the "approved" redistricting maps can be found here
The new proposed legislative district containing Wasatch County, maintains the integrity of the county as a whole and combines it with some of Summit County (PKC). While my preference would have been to remain united with Duchesne, this is probably not a bad alternative. Wasatch fared much better than Duchesne, see below.
The consensus
of those who "should" be concerned seems to be, as long as Wasatch is maintained
as a whole entity in the legislative district with a 2 to 1 voting majority,
it's fine.
Many also believe it is better to have more Senators representing us, as we would have problems influencing that election as a small county. An interesting idea, but my comments are posted in the redistricting website (which is still soliciting comments - and the time is short, as the decision is scheduled to be made Monday in a Special Legislative session).
Many also believe it is better to have more Senators representing us, as we would have problems influencing that election as a small county. An interesting idea, but my comments are posted in the redistricting website (which is still soliciting comments - and the time is short, as the decision is scheduled to be made Monday in a Special Legislative session).
"I still
maintain that community integrity is more important than the artificially forced
goal of 0% deviation of population on already old data (census) to be used for
the next decade during which the population distribution will obviously change.
A multitude of unnecessary community division can, have and will, be reported.
These will created problems for county clerks in modifying precinct boundaries
to conform to these broken town et al boundaries.
If the intent is to avoid a lawsuit with 0%, I fear that will NOT work - logical natural geographical and community boundaries would be more defensible, and acceptable.
It is a difficult enough process as it is, without imposing this unnatural meaningless artificiality for a count in a moment of time.
These comments apply equally to the legislative and congressional districts.
If the intent is to avoid a lawsuit with 0%, I fear that will NOT work - logical natural geographical and community boundaries would be more defensible, and acceptable.
It is a difficult enough process as it is, without imposing this unnatural meaningless artificiality for a count in a moment of time.
These comments apply equally to the legislative and congressional districts.
Duchesne: From the Vernal Express “On the floor there can still be amendments and changes, but after
taking all of the public input in the summer this (House base map) is
the consensus of where we’re at,” said Van Tassell, who conceded that
the approved map affects Duchesne County “pretty severely.”
From the same article: “I have not decided whether I will be seeking reelection, no matter what
the boundaries are in any seat in 2012,” (Rep. Kraig Powell) said Friday. “The
Legislature is a very demanding job, especially in Utah, where it is
always a second job. With family obligations and work obligations, I’m
always struggling as to how to fulfill my legislative duties best.”
No comments:
Post a Comment